← Ascent Christchurch

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at Ascent Christchurch

decks
9 (5.7% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
74 35-29-10
overall winrate
54.1%
ELO-adjusted winrate
52.2% avg ELO +0.8 per match
expected value
50.0% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
49.5% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1375 · median 1346 · range 1172–1619 (9 pilots with an ELO rating)
973 Q1 1208 Q3 1405 1702
44% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 11% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 20.3% 20 7-11-2 40.0% 41.7% 36.7% -5.1
Fire Crux Mage 13.3% 10 6-4-0 60.0% 57.1% 65.5% +7.0
Wind Allies 8.2% 2 0-1-1 25.0% 41.7% 32.6% -16.7
Wind Razorgale 7.0% 8 2-5-1 31.2% 37.5% 40.7% -4.5
Wind Shadowstrike 6.3% 6 4-1-1 75.0% 65.0% 67.4% +9.3
Fire Exia 5.1% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 52.4% +2.3
Fire Luxem Assassin 4.4% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 63.0% +20.8
Fire Aggro 3.8% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% +0.0
Fire Slimes 3.2% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 44.1% -5.6
Water Allies 3.2% 6 3-1-2 66.7% 60.0% 60.6% +5.7
Wind Astra Cleric 2.5% 3 0-2-1 16.7% 35.7% 35.8% -10.6
Water Penguin Mill 1.9% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 65.3% +14.6
Fire Crux Lorraine 1.3% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 53.0% +4.9
Fire Umbra Ranger 1.3% 0
Wind Cats 1.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 55.0% +8.0
Wind Crux Mage 1.3% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 57.5% +7.2
Wind Exia 1.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.1% +14.6
Fire Astra Cleric 0.6% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 45.9% -4.0
Fire Crux Hybrid 0.6% 0
Norm Tera Silvie 0.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.1% +12.9
Water Arisanna 0.6% 0
Water Astra Cleric 0.6% 0
Water Crux Merlin 0.6% 0
Water Diana 0.6% 0
Water Silvie 0.6% 0
Wind Arcane 0.6% 0
Wind Lorraine 0.6% 0
Wind Neos 0.6% 0
Wind Overlord 0.6% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 61.3% +18.0
Wind Slimes 0.6% 2 1-1-0 50.0% 50.0% 45.5% -4.3
Wind Tera Silvie 0.6% 0
Decklists · 9 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 1 mirror match (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 1 mirror is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 1 mirror we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 24 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 24 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Orb of Sealing +1.00 1 0 0
Song of Frost -1.00 0 1 0
Primordial Ritual +1.00 1 0 0
Fractal of Polar Depths -1.00 0 1 0
Diffusive Block +1.00 1 0 0
Revitalizing Cleanse +1.00 1 0 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +1.00 1 0 0
Snow Fairy +1.00 1 0 0
Freezing Steel -1.00 0 1 0
Hailstorm Guard +1.00 1 0 0
Ghostsight Glass -1.00 0 1 0
Tonoris, Lone Mercenary +1.00 1 0 0
Seasprite Diver +1.00 1 0 0
Cerulean Decree +1.00 1 0 0
Seaside Ringleader -1.00 0 1 0
Safeguard Amulet -1.00 0 1 0
Tideholder Claymore -1.00 0 1 0
Tidestone Bovine -1.00 0 1 0
Tariff Ring -1.00 0 1 0
Nullifying Mirror +1.00 1 0 0
Bauble of Abundance +1.00 1 0 0
Crimson Protective Trinket +1.00 1 0 0
Tidal Lock -1.00 0 1 0
Silvie, Wilds Whisperer -1.00 0 1 0

JSON: /api/events/14889/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill